Issues in Operational Control in Human Resource Desk: The Turn of the Pandemic
Abstract
The traditional system of work practice avows that company owners who have the means of production also have the power to control the will of their employees. The labour system was such that employees lobbied to earn their workplace. However, with the emergence of the new normal, companies are under threat as many young people who constitute the larger market of the workforce are beginning to shift their attention to the block chain economy. For many of these young minds, the daily routines of work can also be done from home. Having inclined themselves to the new media space, many of them resign to devote their time to the e-desk economy. The paper then avows that with the emergence of the new normal, company owners must adjust their work operational ethics and practice with their staff as decline in labour and service can affect the production desk, thereby leading to inflation. The paper is an anova test study of young people within the University of Port Harcourt axis on their attitude towards passive income system of earnings.
References
2. Jorgenson, D. & Stinoh, K. (2000). Raising the Speed Limit Versus Economic Growth in information Age. Unpublished Article, Harvard University (220).
3. Kaplan, R. & Norton, D.( 2004). Human Resource Development, Advantages of Economic Growth, www.kn.com.
4. Lap, L. (2012). Human Capital Development and Economic Growth in Nigeria. European Journal, 8(2),180.
5. Ome-Egeonu, A. (2014). Human Resource Management: Prospects and Challenges in Nigeria. Nigeria: Vita Publishing.
6. Rokonuzzaman & Rahman (2011). Workplace Harassment and Productivity, a Comprehensive Role of Strategic Leadership, the Journal of General Education.
7. Shima (2013). Meaning and Concept of Recruitment.
8. Silbert (2005). Social Stress and Performance in Human-Machine Interaction; a Neglected Research Field. Ergonomics 62(11), 1377-1391.
9. Speedy (2006), Reio & Ghosh (2009), Sidle (2009). The Effect of Workplace Incivility on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Trust; a Study of Industrial Enterprises in Turkey. WEI International Academic Reference Proceedings. Vienna, Austria, 12-15.
10. Stephenson (2008). Cross-Cultural Environmental Research and Management, Challenges and Progress. Taylor and Francis group 39(4), 139-149.
11. Teece, D. Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35.
12. Walker, B. Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S.R. & Kinzig. A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformality in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society. 9(2),5-13.URL http://www.Ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/arts.
13. Werner, N.(2008). Resource Dependence Theory: How Well Does it Explain Behaviour of Organisations? Management Revue. 19(1-2). Retrieved October 29. 2018. From https://www.Uni-Due.De/Apo/Download/Merv_1+2_Nienbueser.Pdf.
14. Yeganegi, K. & Azar, M.S. Z.A. (2012). “The Effect of IT on Organizational Agility” Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, July 3-6,2537-2544.
15. Zapf. D. (2004). Negative Social Behaviour at Work and Workplace Bullying. In S. Einarsen & M. B. Nielson (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace (p.25). Bergen Norway: University of Bergen.
16. Zauderer (2002). Workplace Incivility and Management of Human Capital. Public Manager 31(1) 37-42
17. Zellars, K. L., Justice, L, & Beck, T. E. (2011). Resilence: New Paths for Building and Sustaining Individual and Organisational Capacity. In P.L. Perrewe, & D. C. Ganster (Eds), the Role of Individual Differences in Occupational Stress and Well-being (Pp. 1-37). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
18. Zhang, R. & Liu, W. (2012). Organizational Residence Perspective: Facilitating Organizational Adaptation Analysis. IPEDR, 28(2), 55-59.
In submitting the manuscript to the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
