Workplace Spirituality and Employee Engagement; A Study on Identifying the Moderating Impact of Work From Home
Abstract
Spirituality has been known as a central area of research in the academic world over the past few years, to bring more significance to one's workplace. By integrating the multiple meanings of workplace spirituality, this paper defines it as having compassion toward others and experiencing a mindful inner consciousness in the pursuit of meaningful work that enables transcendence. Currently, organizations are promoting a spiritual culture that recognizes that employees have a mind as well as a spirit, seek to find meaning and purpose in their work, and wish to connect with other employees and be part of the community. Due to this pandemic situation whole world and whole sectors moves towards digitalization. There was a question whether the spiritual mind set will remain the same as work in office; even the people are away from the office. With this identification, this paper attempts to identify the impact of workplace spirituality and employee engagement with identifying the moderating effect of work from home. It was found that there is a significant positive relationship between workplace spirituality and employee engagement in higher education academics in Sri Lanka. Same time the study identified that there is no moderating effect of work from home between workplace spirituality and employee engagement.
References
2. Ashmos DP, Duchon D (2000) Spirituality at work: a conceptualization and measure. Journal of Management Inquiry 9 (2): 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260092008
3. Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Where to go from here: Integration and future research on work engagement. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.) & M. P. Leiter, Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 181–196). Psychology Press.
4. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. 2008a. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress 22:187–200
5. Baruch, Y. (2001). The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(2), 113-129.
6. Brynjolfsson, Erik, Avinash Collis, and Felix Eggers, “Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116 (15), 7250–7255.
7. Cacioppe, R. (2000), “Creating spirit at work: re-visioning organization development and leadership – Part I”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 48-54.
8. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
9. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
10. Desa M, Nasina, Pin KP Doris (2011). “the workplace spirituality and affective commitment among Auditors in big four public accounting firms: does it matter?”, Journal of Global Management Vol 2,No 01 pp 216 -224
11. Giacalone R A, Jurkiewicz C L (2003b). Toward a science of workplace spirituality. In: Giacalone RA, Jurkiewicz CL (Eds) Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Performance. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 3–28.
12. Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. 2002. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:268–79
13. Kahn WA. 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 33:692–724
14. Kahn WA. 1992. To be fully there: psychological presence at work. Hum. Relat. 45:321–49
15. Karakas, F. (2010). Spirituality and performance in organizations: Aliterature review. Journal of business ethics, 94(1), 89-106.
16. Kinjierski VM, Skrypnek BJ (2004) Defining spirit at work: finding common ground. Journal of Organizational Change Management 17 (1): 26–42. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/09534810410511288
17. Krishnakumar, S., & Neck, C. P. (2002).The “what”, “why” and “how” of spirituality in the workplace. Journal of managerial psychology, 17(3), 153-164.
18. Lloyd, T. (1990). The nice company. London: Bloomsbury.
19. Daniel, J. L. (2010). The effect of workplace spirituality on team effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 29(5), 442–456.
20. Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy: Implications for managerial effectiveness and development. The Journal of Management Development, 21(5/6), 376–387.
21. Macey WH, Schneider B. 2008. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 1:3–30
22. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. 2001. Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:397–422
23. Milliman J, Czaplewski AJ, Ferguson J (2003) Workplace spirituality and employee work attitudes: an exploratory empirical assessment. Journal of Organizational Change Management 16 (4): 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310484172
24. Mitroff II, Denton EA (1999a) A study of spirituality in the workplace. Sloan Management Review 40: 83–92.
25. Rego A, Cunha MA (2008) Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment: an empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management 21 (1): 53–75. https://doi. org/10.1108/09534810810847039
26. Robinson D, Perryman, S. & Hayday, S. (2004). The Drivers of Employee Engagement, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton, Report 408, retrieved on December 14th, 2011.
27. Roof, R. A. (2015). The association of individual spirituality on employee engagement: The spirit at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(3), 585-599.
28. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
29. Saks, A. M. (2011). Workplace spirituality and employee engagement. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(4), 317–340.
30. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work Engagement with a short questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66, 701-716.
31. Sreeramana Aithal, (2015). An empirical study on working from home: a popular e-business model; International Journal of Advance and Innovative Research, Volume 2, Issue 2 (I): April - June 2015. ISSN 2394 – 7780
32. Truss, C., Soane, E., Edwards, C., Wisdom, K., Croll, A. and Burnett, J. (2006) Working Life: Employee Attitudes and Engagement 2006. London, CIPD.
In submitting the manuscript to the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.