Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance of Quoted Oil and Gas Companies in Nigeria
Abstract
This research was conducted to investigate the relationship between sustainability reporting and financial performance of quoted oil and gas companies in Nigeria. Data was collected from a sample of 10 companies for period of 10 years from 2010 to 2019. Financial performance was measured using return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Sustainability reporting was measured using environmental performance indicator (ENVPI); social performance indicator (SOCPI); and economic performance indicator (ECOPI). The panel least square (PLS) regression estimation technique was adopted for data analysis. In addition, common sample descriptive and Pearson correlation were also used to enhance data analysis. Findings of the research revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between environmental, social and economic performance indicators and return on assets. Environmental and social performance indicators had a positive non-significant relationship with return on equity while economic performance indicators had a significantly positive relationship with return on equity. Based on the findings, it was concluded that sustainability reporting activities are important factors in enhancing financial performance. It is was recommended that oil and gas companies should properly articulate the environmental issues they intend to respond to on the basis of those that will have the most direct and largest effect on their financial performance. It is further suggested that companies conduct critical review of their corporate social activities and whittle down on those that do not make commensurate contribution to financial performance while at the same time channeling more resources to the more financial value enhancing activities. Finally, industry leaders and policy makers liaise to develop an industry standard and template for sustainability reporting that will be legally binding on all companies in the industry.
References
2. Akinlo, O. O. & Iredele, O. O. (2014). Corporate environmental disclosures and market value of quoted companies in Nigeria. The Business & Management Review, 5(3),
3. Asaolu, T. O., Agboola, A. A., Ayoola, T. J. & Salawu, M. K. (2011).Sustainability reporting in the Nigerian oil and gas sector. Proceedings of the Environmental Management Conference, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
4. Asuquo, A. I; Dada, E. T.; & Onyeogaziri, U. R. (2018).The effect of sustainability reporting on corporate performance of selected quoted brewery firms in Nigeria, International Journal of Business & Law Research. 6(3):1-10.
5. Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182-194.
6. Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1-15.
7. Chikwendu, O. U.; Okafor, G. O.; &Jesuwunmi, C. D. A. (2019). Effect of sustainability reporting on Nigerian listed companies’ performance, Canadian Contemporary Research Journal, 1(1): 96-111.
8. Chow, W. S. & Chen, Y. (2012). Corporate sustainable development: Testing a new scale based on the mainland Chinese context. Journal of business ethics, 105(4), 519-533.
9. Deegan C., Rankin M., &Tobin J. (2002), «An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: a test of legitimacy theory», Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3)
10. Gray, R., Kouhy, R. & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental accounting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 8(2), 47-77.
11. Gray R. H., Javad M., Power D. M. & Sinclair C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28 (3/4), 327-356.
12. GRI (2011). Sustainability reporting guidelines, version 3.1., Global Reporting Initiative
13. Gupta, M. &Gupta, D. (2011). Research methodology, New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited
14. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of cleaner production, 59, 5-21.
15. Herzig, C., &Schaltegger, S. (2006). Corporate sustainability reporting. An overview. In Sustainability accounting and reporting. Springer, Dordrecht.
16. Iheduru, N.G. &Okoro, C.U. (2019). Sustainable reporting and profitability of quoted firms in Nigeria: a multi-dimensional panel data study, Australian Finance & Banking Review, 3(1).
17. Ivan, O. R. (2009). Sustainability in accounting basis: a conceptual framework. Annales Universittatis Apulensis Oeconomica. 11 (1), 106-116.
18. Jasch, C. & Stasiskiene, Z. (2005).From environmental management accounting to sustainability management accounting. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management,4(34): 77-88.
19. Landi, G., &Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11-27.
20. Lee, J. Niranjan, P. & James, J. R. (2011). The relationship between corporate sustainability performance and tangible business performance: Evidence from Oil and Gas Industry. 3(3).
21. Lukluk, F.; Henda, R. & Yuliani, Y. (2019).Factors influencing sustainability reporting and financial performance in Indonesia. Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic and Economics and Business. 3(53).https://10.29259/sijdeb.v3i1.53-72.
22. MarkWasara, T. & Ganda, F. (2019). The relationship between corporate sustainability disclosure and firm financial performance in Johannesburg stock exchange (JSE) listed mining companies, MPDI Sustainability, 11(4496): 2-23.
23. Nnamani, J. N.; Onyekwelu, U. L. &Ugwu, O. K. (2017). Effect of sustainability accounting and reporting on financial performance of firms in Nigeria brewery sector, European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 5(1): 1-15.
24. Olayinka, M. U. & Temitope, O. F. (2011). CSR and financial performance: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Economic and Sustainability Development, 3(4), 44-54.
25. Oncioiu, I.; Petrescu, A. G.; Bîlcan, F. R.; Petrescu, M.; Popescu, D. M. & Anghel, E. (2020). Corporate sustainability reporting and financial performance, MPDI Sustainability 12(4297): 1-13.
26. Popescu, D.; Holban, I.; Petrescu, A.; Bîlcan, F.; & Marius, P. (2020). Corporate sustainability reporting and financial performance. MPDI: Sustainability. 12. 4297. https://10.3390/su12104297.
27. Powei, M. D. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational performance of oil companies in Southern Nigeria, Walden PHD Dissertation, Walden University, https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/disse
28. Rangarajan, K. & Kumar, J. (2020).Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility. 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z
29. Sarita, V. C. &Rasmini, N. K. (2018). The effect of sustainability report on financial performance with good corporate governance quality as a moderating variable, International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 40(2): 139-149.
30. Simnet, R., Vanstraelen, A. & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84(3), 937-967.
31. Utile, B. J. (2016). Effect of sustainability reporting on firm’s performance: A review of literature. International Journal of Business & Management, 4(7), 203-208
32. Uwuigbe, U. & Uadiale, O. M. (2011). Corporate social and environmental disclosure in Nigeria: A comparative study of the building material and brewery industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 258
33. Uwuigbe, U. & Teddy, O.; Uwuigbe, O. & Ozordi, E.; Osariemen, A.; Eyitomi, G. A. & Taiwo, O. S.. (2018). Sustainability reporting and firm performance: A bi-directional approach. Academy of Strategic Management Journal.17. 1-16.
In submitting the manuscript to the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.